Long-distance relationships are usually framed as a deficit to be managed. One of the better studies on this found the opposite: long-distance couples reported feeling more intimate than couples living nearby. It also found why, and the mechanism has a catch that changes how you should plan a virtual date.
TL;DR
- Virtual date ideas: 25 options across parallel activity, watching things, games, structured talking, and effort that crosses the distance.
- The finding: a diary study in the Journal of Communication found long-distance couples reported feeling more intimate than couples living nearby.
- Two mechanisms: they disclosed more, and they idealized their partner's behavior, with both strongest in text-based media.
- The catch: idealization means some of that closeness is a flattering picture, so include ordinary time and not only occasions.
- Fewer contacts, more effort: long-distance couples had fewer daily interactions than local ones and still felt closer.
- Fix first: always have the next visit on the calendar, which makes the distance finite rather than open-ended.
What the Research Found:
Distance can increase felt intimacy. In a diary study published in the Journal of Communication, dating couples in long-distance and geographically close relationships logged their daily interactions across face-to-face contact, phone, video chat, texting, instant messaging and email for a week [1][2].
The long-distance couples felt closer. Two mechanisms drove it: they disclosed more about themselves, and they idealized their partners’ behavior, and both effects were stronger in text-based, asynchronous and mobile media because those couples worked harder to overcome the limits of the medium [2].
One detail reframes the whole thing. Long-distance participants reported significantly fewer interactions per day than local couples, but used more channels and had more calls, video chats and messages [1]. Fewer contacts, more effort, and the effort was the point.
“People don’t have to be so pessimistic about long-distance romance” [1]
Crystal Jiang, on the study’s findings
The Catch Worth Knowing:
Idealization is half the mechanism. One of the two drivers of that greater intimacy was couples idealizing each other, which researchers describe as a hyperpersonal effect: at a distance you compensate by perceiving overwhelmingly the good parts [1].
That is worth sitting with rather than skipping. Some of the closeness is genuine disclosure and some is a flattering picture built in the absence of ordinary friction. Plan for the ordinary, then, rather than only for the curated version, because the reunion is where the gap shows up.
The practical translation is simple. Include some unremarkable time in your virtual dates, not only occasions. Cooking badly, doing admin side by side, or being tired together is closer to a relationship than a well-lit evening where you are both at your best.
25 Virtual Date Ideas:
Do something, do not just talk. A call with no activity puts the entire burden on conversation, and thirty minutes in that starts to feel like a meeting.
Parallel Activity, Low Effort:
- Cook the same recipe in two kitchens and compare results
- Eat dinner together with the call propped up, no agenda
- Work or do admin side by side with cameras on and no talking required
- Read the same chapter, then call and argue about it
- Do a crossword or puzzle on a shared screen
- Get ready for your respective evenings together
Watch Something Properly:
- Start a movie at the same second and stay on the call throughout
- Run a two-person film festival on a theme, one each per week
- Watch the thing the other person loves and be a good sport
- Watch a live event, sport or otherwise, and text through it
- Pick a documentary and pause to talk, which is better than not pausing
Games and Competition:
- Play an online game neither of you is good at
- Quiz each other from a general knowledge app, scores kept
- Chess or backgammon on an app, one move a day
- Online escape room, which produces genuine teamwork
- Guess where the other person is from a photo they take
Tell us about yourself and what you're looking for.
Discover compatible singles picked just for you.
Break the ice and make a real connection.
Join millions finding love on Match
Talking, Structured:
- One deep question per call, both answering fully
- Plan a trip you will actually take, in real detail
- Trade playlists and explain each choice
- Virtual museum or gallery tour, one room each
- Show each other around your own neighborhood on video
Effort That Crosses the Distance:
- Send food or a drink to arrive during the call
- Mail something physical, which lands differently from anything digital
- Take the same photo challenge and compare at the end of the week
- Read to each other before sleep
Rotate the categories rather than defaulting to the same call every time. Couples who do only one type of virtual date get bored of the format rather than of each other, and the fix is variety in the container rather than more frequency.
| Type | Best for | Length |
|---|---|---|
| Parallel activity | Ordinary weeknights, low energy | An hour or two |
| Watching something | When neither of you can talk much | A movie’s length |
| Games | Restarting things after a flat week | 30 to 60 minutes |
| Structured talking | Once a week, when both rested | An hour |
| Physical effort | Occasions, or a bad week | Whenever |
Why Text Matters More Than You Think:
The effects were strongest in text, not video, which is the opposite of the usual assumption. In the study, the intimacy-enhancing tendencies showed up most in text-based, asynchronous and mobile media, apparently because those channels forced more deliberate effort [2].
So the daily message thread is not the lesser version of the video call. It may be doing more of the work, particularly the version where you write something considered rather than sending a stream of logistics. Write one real thing each day rather than fifty small ones, and our guide to long distance relationships covers the wider habit.
Ready for something real?
Enjoy free dating and sign up today.
What Goes Wrong:
Five patterns account for most of the trouble, and none of them is the distance itself.
- Calls with no activity, which become status meetings within two weeks.
- Scheduling by good intention, so the call happens when both are exhausted.
- Only showing the good version, which builds a picture that reunion has to survive.
- No next visit on the calendar, which turns the distance from finite into open-ended.
- Time zones treated as a solvable problem rather than a constraint to design around.
Fix the fourth one first. A date on the calendar changes the character of the whole arrangement, because a long-distance relationship with a known end point is a different experience from one without.
How Often, and For How Long:
Fewer, better contacts beat constant ones. The long-distance couples in the research had fewer daily interactions than local couples and still felt closer, which suggests that being permanently available is not the goal [1].
A workable rhythm is one real conversation a day in whatever medium suits, one real virtual date a week with an activity attached, and one visit on the calendar at all times. Protect the weekly one the way you would a booking, since it is the thing that gets canceled first when either of you is busy.
Why Match Delivers ResultsThe most trusted platform for finding meaningful connections
Join the largest community across all 50 states
Advanced filters to find your soulmate
Real profiles, genuine connections
Meet singles just around the corner
What the Study Does Not Settle:
This was one diary study, run over a week, with dating couples rather than a broad population, and it measured what people reported rather than how the relationships turned out. Related work has found long-distance relationships showing equal or greater trust and satisfaction than nearby ones, so the direction is reasonably consistent [3], but none of it promises a particular relationship will work.
The context figures usually quoted alongside it are also aging. A journal release accompanying the study reported around three million married couples in the United States living apart, and a substantial share of college students being in a long-distance relationship at some point, but those numbers date from 2013 [4]. Treat them as indicative rather than current.
Decide how far is workable before you start rather than negotiating it later, which is one thing the search filters are genuinely good for. People clear about wanting something lasting tend to say so on their serious dating profile.
Not at a distance yet? The filters here narrow by distance, values, and goals. Browse singles in your area.
[1] https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2013/08/new-media-allows-requited-love-know-no-distance – Cornell Chronicle on Jiang and Hancock’s study, including fewer daily interactions, more channels, and the hyperpersonal idealization effect
[2] https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/565450 – EurekAlert on the two mechanisms driving greater intimacy and the media in which they were strongest
[3] https://academic.oup.com/joc/article-abstract/63/3/556/4086003 – Jiang and Hancock, Absence Makes the Communication Grow Fonder, Journal of Communication, 2013, 63(3), 556-577
[4] https://www.healthday.com/health-technology-information-18/misc-computer-health-news-150/long-distance-relationship-may-strengthen-couple-s-bond-678368.html – HealthDay, reporting the study and the 2013 context figures on long-distance relationships
Key points
Find your new relationship at Match
Your ideal match is just a click away ! Find your new relationship at Match
Meet and date singles