I am trying to get my PhD degree, so that keeps me pretty busy and - uh, oh - I am here. I don't believe in god and online dating. Neither worked for me so far - but the hope is the last one to die. So, bare truth and let's try not to be pathetic.
Anyhow, I am pretty average for someone in my field: u know, best student in high school, one of the few "straight A's" at the graduation from the University. Modest as well, yup. Been in relationships, long ones mostly, didn't work out.
Briefly the current situation is as follows: atheist, scientist, sharp mind, good shape. Love motorcycles, my job, mountains, ocean, captivating books and movies and spending time with good people.
What am I looking for in a lady? No, the Lady, if I may: good looks, charming personality and decent level of education. However, it eventually precipitates down to just about one thing - it either "clicks" or it does not, just like friendship. Is it possible to predict who would become a friend? Hardly so. Some people tend to sympathize with others for a variety of reasons, often quite subtle and hardly explicable. So why would a partnership in a relationship be any different? And it is not, certainly, besides one aspect, as important as it is tabooed; origin of all fears and controversies – on one hand, and potentially so rewarding when appropriately delivered, and therefore desired – on the other.
Well, if everything is so simple, then why is it always so darn complicated? I'd dare guess: wrong priorities. One aspect is civil, other is still savage to an extent. Both are important, but the sequence is even more so. The establishment of proper companionship is the key, but it's possible only when both parties sincerely realize what their mutual needs and intentions are and do not ignore them.